Western Nations Trade and Exchange in the 18th Century an Example of the Topic History Essays by

Western Nations Trade and Exchange in the 18th Century What was the role of the trade and exchange in the western nations in the 18th century? Trade resulted as a result of the communication that started to take shape in the prehistoric times. In the past it included exchange of goods and services or exchange of goods for services. In the 18th century trade or commerce was the backbone of many western nations. Other words they much valued trade as it earned them a lot of money. Curtin strongly believed that trade and exchange represented the key external stimuli to development. This is what in a nutshell this essay is all about. Need essay sample on "Western Nations Trade and Exchange in the 18th Century" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed During the 18th century, the key economic principles of Western nations were government expenditure and revenues, agricultural production and the foreign trade. In Western Europe at this period, it was believed that the welfare of all people would be taken care of if all nations embraced the policy of free trade as opposed to the military expeditions. As Maynard Keynes once put it, the individuals welfare is more important than that of the nation. The free economy to him meant that the majority would be the decision makers as opposed to the government. It was believed that if people were allowed to budget on their revenues, job opportunities and on what to use or save than, then the quality of life would be uplifted. According to Adam Smith in his book the wealth of nations, the government was supposed to regulate the free trade economy by ensuring that the operation mechanisms were in place and were followed to the letter. These were things such as monopoly regulation and enforcement of business contract. Before the 18th century the Britains economy was largely dependent on agriculture and military aggressions but it slowly evolved into an urbanized and industrial economy in the 18th century and in the next centuries. (Jan de Vries, 1976; 52-78) The industrial economy that took place in Britain in the 18th century involved exchange of goods and services. People started relying on trade unlike before when they relied on agriculture economy. Trade and exchange made people to reassess their social obligations as well as their family structures. In the past, most families relied on the rural economy but in 18th century they abandoned this strategy and embarked on a capitalist and urban economy. This involved terms and contracts, markets, trade, currencies and bills of exchange. The prosperity that the Western nations achieved due to this trade set a stage for transforming these nations from urban economy to capitalism. The urban economy started as a simple exchange of stock, keeping shops or in short what can be referred to as the exchange of material culture and then into a fully-fledged industrial economy. The western world started to value trade when they realized that it was the only source of money that was used to finance all its military operations. According to (Curtin P., 1984; 25-85) military conquest proved itself not to be enough and for this reason he believed that the role that trade and exchange would play in transforming the history of mankind would be very crucial as it is the only external stimuli that can bring change in our societies. He believes that external stimulation is the single most important as far as change and development in various fields such as art, technology and science are concerned. Inoder to traditionally integrate the income that can be used to cater for social welfare can be obtained, (Marianna B. 2005) a nation like Britain looked for overseas colonies where they could establish their business and exploit the local market of these colonies that were yet untapped. The basic approach to the international trade depends on the expected benefits either in terms of growth or welfare improvement. Economic gains increased whenever nations pursue cross-border commerce took place. This is because whenever you offer something new in the market and this makes people curious to try it out. This is what western nations believed in trade and trade as they discovered that military operations in search of wealth was costing them very much than what they anticipated. They started focusing more on the trade and exchange. The Britains economy thus stretched to each and every corner of the continent except in Antarctica. Its rapidly growing market economy earned Britain enormous benefits that led to the development of manufacturing and industrial economy. Another reason that perhaps led Britain to go overseas in search of market for its products was the fact that mercantilism had well established itself properly in this country something that made other nations to start thinking of the same. They realized the local industries would only achieve that by protecting the local industries by taxing and other duties. This made this commerce unprofitable and they had to look for alternatives. From then henceforth, every time it conquered an oversea territory, it monopolized it with its products and a classic example of this is the North America where half of the British products were exported. (Blanning T. 2000; 291-303) The policy of trade and exchange as a stimulus to change was evident and successful in the Ottoman Empire. Here this government regulated the international trade by giving some states the trading rights. He allowed some states to conduct trading activities and while he restricted some. This ensured that there was continuous inflow of such products that his empire would not provide for the people. Nations that had very weak external stimuli remained poor while others that had strong stimuli became rich and dominant. (Hancock D.1995; 123) This research has come to the conclusion that trade and exchange are the external stimuli to change. Many western nations realized this long before and that is why they were more prosperous than others as in the past they only relied on military operations. These western nations that are prosperous started. While pursuing international affairs, these nations they were well aware of the importance of protecting their own industries back at home. This is why a country like Britain introduced what was called Corn Laws that were made to protect the agricultural market at home. That is why if any country wants to prosper, then it should extend its business hands to various parts like the way European nations were doing in the 18th century. References: Curtin P. D. Cross Cultural Trade in World History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1984; 25-85. Marianna B. Cross Cultural Trade and Internal Institutional Stability. Hancock D. Citizens of the World: London Merchants and Integration of the British _ Atlantic Community. 1735-1785. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1995: 123. Blanning T. Eighteen Century: Europe 1688-1815. Oxford University Press, 2000: 291- 303 Jan de Vries. The economy of Europe in an Age of Crisis, 1600-1750. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1976: 52-78.

Key Quotations Assignment Essays

Key Quotations Assignment Essays Key Quotations Assignment Essay Key Quotations Assignment Essay Leak entertains Stephan with stories from his memory but whenever Stephen listens to them, he feels as though he is sees of a man for being interested which demeans the way he sees himself. The image of what is expected to be a man [As he] observed the easy strength Of these men, the more certain he was that he was that he could never become a man had been imprinted in his mind because he was surrounded by people that he was expected to live up to and become. His father expects him to become strong and work as a pulp cutter. Stephen sees the image of what he is supposed to live up to and because of it, he was expected to scorn now that he was becoming a man compelling him to abandon his childish nature. Nolan emphasizes on the internal conflicts that Stephan has within himself by creating a kind of push and pull scenario for Stephan to overcome. On one hand, the stories that Leak tells Stephen keeps him entertained and happy but on the other hand, Stephan is expected to live up to his father expectations and fill in his shoes. He is forced to choose between his own desires which are his child-like side or adapt to the conformity to gain his fathers respect. Theme: Mayo try to hard kid. The Pollack murmured. You act as if the saw were the most important thing in the world. One of the targeted themes of the story as that becoming a man isnt everything. Throughout the first half of the story, Nolan showed that Stephan had internal conflict within his own mind as he had a difficult time denying his identity for the acceptance of his father, but as the story progressed, with the help of Leak, he began accepting who he is. He began to consider what Leak had to say and thought about something other than what his father wanted. He began thinking of his own desires and choices instead of having such a narrow mind and thinking of being something other than being a man just because his father wanted him to. He accepted the fact that being a man isnt the most important thing in the world. Nolan shows us the importance of being able to think for yourself and fighting against conformity and pressure allowing the open mind of possibilities and alternatives. Stephan sees that he can be more than just a pulp cutter. He also sees that he is trying too hard to be something he is not, which was what created that internal conflict within himself and comparing his own inadequacy to another. Symbol: In our house in Transpolar, there were glass roses. Pretty little flowers made of red glass. My mother was very proud of them. She would let no one touch them When the first bomb fell, farther down the street, the glass roses were shaken from the mantel and they fell on the floor and broke in a million pieces. There is not much room in the world for glass roses This quotation shows Nolan allowing the destruction of a beautiful glass rose. Through Leaks stories, Nolan uses the glass rose as a representation of Stephens innocence as it is considered beautiful and kind like the glass rose. As Stephen struggles with his inner conflict between manhood and childhood, he is torn between conformity and his innocence. When Leak said the glass roses were shaken from the mantel and they fell on the floor and broke into a million pieces, Nolan was talking about Stephens innocence and possibility of a broken childhood, if it were to be shaken, it would [brake] into a million pieces. This shows that if there were to be instability with Stephen, such as manhood and the pressure of it, it would overcome the fragility of his innocence and destroy the beauty of his identity, desires and himself. The glass rose also represents the friendship that Leak and Stephen have. When We think of a glass rose, We think Of love and beauty and because Leak acts as a shining beacon of hope for Stephen and that creates a beautiful friendship. Stephen learned to become more than what his father wanted him to be by acknowledging the fact that he was very proud of them. Stephen came to the conclusion that Leak was his friend and that means he should stand up for his friend. By doing so, Stephen overcame his inner conflicts whether he should follow in his fathers footsteps or his own. Stephen also acknowledges that there is not much room in the world for glass roses so once he overcame his weakness, he was able to prevail onto utter things such as pursing his desires within himself. Setting: Streaks of daylight were appearing on the black forested, snow- shrouded horizon. The wind had fallen somewhat but it was still raw enough to lacerate Stephens temples The setting Nolan created inferred that Stephen was isolated with nothing but negative influence and pressure from his peers and especially his father that is forced upon Stephen. The story is placed in a dark isolated forest where Stephen is forced to work every day in it but with streaks of daylight appearing on the black forested, snow-shrouded orison. It is used as a beacon of hope that shines in the dark for Stephen when everything else seems so bleak and misguided. The forest is used as kind of a sense of a barrier or shield for Stephen between him and the outside world as the wind had fallen somewhat but it was still raw. Stephen s perception of himself his fixated in the reflection of others but the light not only shows him hope but it also shows that when in the forest, Stephen feels as though his dreams are valid even in the dark. Throughout the day, Stephen is forced to face the disappointment in his fathers eyes hen his father sees Stephen as not a man creating an emotional impact on him. By creating the setting in the forest, it is Stephens way of trying to escape all the expectations and what he is supposed to live up to. Point of view: He thought of the dozens of trees he would have to fell before the end of the day, millions of trees he would have to fell before he died. For as long as he lived, he would kneel beside a tree, a slave to the monotonous rhythm of the pulp saw Throughout the story, Nolan slowly progressed with expressing more and more of Stephens point of view. In the beginning it showed that it was as if Stephen didnt have a point of view to begin with. Everything was so fixated with his fathers perspective on things that it blinded his own vision of his own dreams. This quote not only shows Stephens point of view but it also shows Stephens feelings for as long as he lived he would kneel beside a tree, a slave to the monotonous rhythm of the pulp saw. Stephen projects the thought of having to follow in his fathers footsteps in a negative light displaying a small sense of emotion, he feels as though the life he is living isnt he life he wants but rather the life that his father has built up for him and that worries him.

Discussion unit 3 Social Problems Research Paper

Discussion unit 3 Social Problems - Research Paper Example Matt, drug addict, faced some serious problems during the survival period until the addiction took his life (personal communication, 2012). Drugs have negative impact on attitude and personality of addict. What makes it worse is the overdose of medicine used which results in other disease. Family members play a very important either to help the addict or to bring him down. Parents, siblings, partner and children all are equally destroyed as a family unit. Society is least considered and yet bears most of the consequences (Byrne,2005). Education or job, financial issues or economical issues, over dosage of medication or illegal drugs usage, each and everything plays a role in effecting the society as a whole. The criminal rate goes up and down with the addiction rate. With crimes comes the Law and Order. Is it enough to put a law on the using of drugs or alcohol? If it was enough then the sufferings would not be increasing on such large scale. Measures should be taken by the law beyond the drugs and welfare of addicts. There should be law that should involve the effected family members and other social destructions caused due to addiction. Human service professionals should be entrusted with greater responsibilities so that they can directly have positive impacts in bringing back the addicts to their normal lives. Byrne,A.(2005).Addict in the Family: How to Cope With the Long Haul. Retrieved from

The National Girls and Women in Sports Day Term Paper

The National Girls and Women in Sports Day - Term Paper Example The fact that LSUS has only a single mens sport, being baseball, means that proportionally it would only need one to two womens sports. This would mean that the interest in other sports besides perhaps the top two—basketball and softball—would have to be dismissed. Adding two sports would create enough opportunity for sports participation for the sixty three percent of the student body that is made up of female students, without a difficult strain on funding. This would both be proportional as well as catering to the interest of the female student body. The National Girls and Women in Sports Day (NGWSD) is a day celebrating the participation and achievement of women in sports, and is celebrated across the United States. It began in 1987, a year after the death of Olympic volleyball player Flo Hyman. Hyman died of Marfans Syndrome while playing in a volleyball tournament in Japan in 1986, and in her memorial the national day of recognition and celebration has carried on until the present day. The theme for the 2011 National Girls and Women in Sports Day is â€Å"Title IX at 40: In it for the Long Run†. The day was celebrated on February 1st, 2011.NGWSD is sponsored by the Girl Scouts of America, Girls Inc., the National Womens Law Center, and the Womens Sports Foundation. The organization sponsors and hosts a variety of events around the country, including conventions, workshops, conferences and competitions. It also encourages involvement through donations, organizing local events, and participation in events on a national scale. The early years of the history of the National Association for Women and Girls in Sport (NAWGS) were defined by the formation of a committee that sought to standardize the rules of womens basketball. This committee was formed after Alice Foster of Oberlin College read a paper in 1899 proposing such action. In 1901 these rules were established under the American Association

The American Revolution: War Of Independence

The American Revolution: War Of Independence The American Revolution is a historical event that provokes the true spirit of nationalism in many Americans. They honor the proactive fathers, shake their fists at oppressive England, and applaud at the legends of daring and headship. It has always been the curiosity among the people that how the Americans of the 18th century got along with the victory. How did the green, weakly equipped, roughly trained military of a newborn country consisted of 13 liberated and jointly jealous nations draw closer to crush one of the worlds utmost military powers? Was it unknown New World insurrectionary strategy, French support, British wrong steps, American marksmanship, or the intrusion of great luck that made the difference? The question went on until in the years of 1950s and 1960s, French and American observation in Indochina grasped the life out of the query. There were evident and considerable distinction between the American revolutionary war and Vietnamese dispute. However, after Vietnam it no longer looked dubious that immense armed forces may possibly submerge in an effort with a minor but willful rival along with a resident population whose faithfulness may not be trusted, Above all, when the expenses of the warfare and ambiguity about its reasons damaged the big powers national help. All those circumstances were present in Britains battle with its American colonies. Post-Vietnam Americans know personally why Britain eventually could prefer to remove its military- albeit it was not totally crushed -rather than to lengthen a devastating struggle. Even so, the American Revolution is an unsuitable name for the reason that it was not really a revolution. Dr. George Grant (2003) define revolution as, the revolution occur when men goes for aggressive warfare not in favor of their command because they desire instantaneous alteration in or eradication of the previous command. (Grant, 2003, no. 20) These all things are found in the French Revolution, but not in the so-called American Revolution. Rather looking for essential reformation of society, the earlier fathers sought to defend traditional rights. (Woods, pp. 11). If it was not a revolution, then what was the American Revolution? Conceivably more appropriate terminology would be the American War for Independence. Longing to transform Englands rule as a result that the colonies would be regulated legitimately, the earlier fathers struggled no revolution, only a war for Independence in which Americans threw off British authority in order to retain their liberties and self-governm ent. (Woods, year, pp. 14). Their reflection formed by people like John Locke, John Calvin and Montesquieu, the first Americans had a conventional outlook of government that they assumed England had desecrated. Americans appealed to the King of England to reinstate their civil rights, but the king rejected. Hopeless of settlement, the colonists look forward to solve their problem by own self to reinstate the control, not to produce a new one. If the term revolution were applied, it would be more correct to declare that the revolutionaries were the English king and parliamentarians who rebuffed to go along with the printed agreements that they had handed over the colonies. (Grant, 2003, no. 20) Even though many hated British rule but the colonists did not desire to be free because they concealed abhorrence for England. There were various basis of war and were greatest significance to the Americans, who just wanted to claim their constitutional rights as British subjects. Earlier than the war, according to Woods, they complained that their early-chartered rights were being debased. (Woods, pp. 13) These all-primitive chartered rights were the mixture of the Magna Charta, the Arbroath Petition, and the English Bill of Rights. All these rights provided the same rights to the colonies as to the English cities. The Magna Charta granted stated observances of which we have granted in our kingdom as far as pertains to us towards are men, shall be observed in our entire kingdom. (Magna Charta) Nevertheless, King George III was not giving them their full rights that he was giving to English cities by imposing additional taxes and laws that were not there in England itself. Instead of hearing Americans plea peacefully, the Americans were charged ruthlessly by the British government to insure the price of the war. As John Locke describes tyranny in his Second Treatise on Government as the application of power ahead of right and that right being in the purpose of government to safeguard all the mankind rather than harming anybody except it is for the purpose to do fairness on an wrongdoer. British breached the rights of the charters, liberty and natural law. What England was forcing on the colonies was also an infringement of the Magna Chartas section 13. By all laws that mentioned above and by their own individual charters, the colonies were legally protected from Englands dishonest proceedings. The primitive Americans were worried about their family; they intended to guard the freedom that they had navigated the ocean to safeguard and the colonists thought that their charters stood as promise. When their complaints were neglected, the colonists struggled tenaciously for freedom. (Grant, 2003, no. 18) The colonists were not struggling for a trouble-free living for themselves, but for liberty from oppression for their companions, kids, and generations to come. They wanted to defend the biblical commandment in spite of of Englands tyranny. Because of salutary neglect a term meaning that English government backed out of the colonies business for years the Americans had efficiently governed themselves while England was busy fighting wars. The colonists had happy and peaceful livelihood when the British were busy in their wars and did not hoped to be bothered. However, at the wrapping up of their wars, Britain began taxing the colonies. As expected, the colonists objected, but the English branded them as extremists. After doing a number of efforts to resolution, the colonists left and go for the way out which was war. In succeeding years, it has been feasible to evaluate further considerately than before the troubles Britain confronted in formulating a successful plan for terminating American confrontation and to point the variations in British notions of how to carry out a complex battle. At first, the British perceived conflict as the discipline of the unruly. According to the second President of the United States John Adams, the record of the American Revolution activated as early as 1620. The Revolution was provoked before the war started. The Revolution was in the hearts of the people. The values and enthusiasm that directed the Americans to rise up and to be located back for two hundred years and wanted in the past of the country from the first initiative in America. More severe in its consequences was the new financial strategy of the British government, which required more funds to sustain the rising empire. Unless the taxpayer in England was to contribute it all, the colonies would have to supply as well. However, takings could be obtained from the colonies simply via a stronger central management, at the cost of colonial autonomy. The foremost action in launching the new structure was the approval of the Sugar Act of 1764. This was planned to gather revenue exclusive of regulating trade. Actually, it substituted the Molasses Act of 1733, which had positioned an excessive import taxes from non-English regions. To impose it, customs representatives were prepared to demonstrate more power and strictness. On the night of April 18, 1775, General Gage transmitted persuasive facts of his battalion to remove these weapons and to take Samuel Adams and John Hancock into custody, both of whom had been commanded to send to England for their trial. However, Paul Revere and two other messengers had warned the whole country. After the quarrel on 18 April 1775 at Concord, the British thought they might finish civil disobedience by separating and reprimanding the insurgents at Boston via display of power. By squeezing the core of struggle, the British expected to get the remainder of the colonies into a row. On the contrary, this tactics did not last long. On 17 June 1775 at the Battle of Bunker Hill, the British instigated a wild frontal attack on the American positions on Breeds Hill in an effort to show the indestructibility of trained armed forces against inexperienced troops. The exhibition was not a success. Despite of the excessive sufferings, the rejection of the Americans to surrender until they tire out their bullets forced the British to have another look at American power. It was no longer convinced that the revolts could be frightened. Moreover, the flood of assistance from further New England towns and the guarantee of abet from the other colonies damaged their certainty that the revolt cente red in Boston only. With first suppositions about the rebellion failing, the British must call for a new plan. On May 10, 1776, a declaration to cut the Gordian knot was approved. At that time only a official announcement was required. On June 7, Richard Henry Lee of Virginia presented a resolution announcing in support of independence, overseas coalitions, and American federation. Instantly, a team of five, supervised by Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, was appointed to dispose a formal statement setting forth the causes which impelled us to this mighty resolution. On 4 July 1776, the day of Independence was declared. It was not only declaration of the newborn state but also lay down the example of philosophy of human freedom for upcoming generation. It lay not specific objections but upon a wide support of individual autonomy that could control common support all over America. The political philosophy behind the liberty was precise and clear: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That is to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed: that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new governmentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ (Jefferson) In the Declaration of Independence, the colonists legitimately declared their self-governance and make a list of injustices carried out against them. At that time, Jefferson made it apparent that in every step of these tyrannies they have formally requested for restoration but they have been disappointed every time. The Revolutionary War persisted for further six years, with combating in every colony. For several months once independence was confirmed, the Americans experienced harsh setbacks. The opening of these was in New York. From the moment the Declaration of Independence was signed, France had not been impartial. The government had been willing to take revenge with England from the time when France was crushed in 1763. In addition to that, eagerness for the American reason was great: the French logical world was itself in rebel against feudalism and its benefits. Yet, although France had appreciated Benjamin Franklin to the French court and had provided aid to the United State s, it had been unwilling to jeopardize of direct intrusion and openly call for war with England. After the war of years, British wishes to take legal action against the war. However, in the year of 1782, the House of Commons voted to discard this attempt. Lord Norths control knocked out, and the new ministry under Lord Rockingham initiated talks with the American peace representatives. Dialogues began in April in Paris and the initial articles of peace were signed on 30 November 1782. After approval by Britain and the U.S. Congress, the ultimate peace treaty was signed September 3, 1783. The war has been refought numerous times in an effort to detect the vital British blunders. Perhaps no policy was identical to the task of soothing American struggle. Regardless of their greater numbers, the British carried out in an aggressive situation that again and again overwhelmed all attempts to stop rebellion. It is correct that as the war heaved on Americans were lethargic to join up, unwilling to pay for still more supplies, and extremely exhausted of the quarrel. However, in the final analysis it was the rebuff of the national population to surrender and the willpower of hundreds of inexperienced, badly supplied militia companies to annoy the opponent that weighed greatly in the crushing of the British forces in America. The former Americans did build a new administration later than the American War for Independence and only in that manner; the earlier fathers can be believed as revolutionaries. Instead of a rebellion of horror and fear, nevertheless, the American Revolution was a diplomatically and fatalistic revolution. After all this, the real revolution started in America when England treated America as a self-regulating state. Americans were looking to modify instead of completely changing the government. Since they were having biblical fundamentals in their society, earlier Americans realized that man is corrupt and on earth, there cannot be an ideal government. Nevertheless, they were having hope that it was achievable with Gods help. Therefore, with the intention of forming an ideal coalition, create justice, assure domestic harmony, present the general security, encourage the common wellbeing, and protected the blessings of independence to ourselves and salute to the former Fathers that initiated the American Reformation. Work Cited The Constitution of the United States of America. Law.emory.edu. 1787. Emory Law School. 1995. DeMar, Gary. Was it Right to Fight the War for Independence? Biblical Worldview Magazine July 2005 Grant, George C. American Culture. Lecture notes. Franklin, Tennessee; Gileskirk, 2003 Jefferson, Thomas The Declaration of Independence. U.S. History.org 1776. U.S. History.org. 1995. Locke, John. Second Treatise on Government. libertyonline.hypermall.com .1690. Liberty Online. 1999 . The Magna Charta Constitution.org 1215. Constitution Society.1995. Woods, Thomas E., Jr., Ph.D. The Politically Correct Guide to American History. Washington D.C.: Regnery Publishing Inc, 2004

History of Latino/a Immigration to the U.S. Essay -- Immigration

Eleanor Roosevelt said, â€Å"the future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams.† That statement holds strong for immigrants in America. Equal access to opportunities allows immigrants to achieve the American dream. Their success correlates with America’s success because of the contributions immigrants provide to America. Unfortunately, the current immigration policy in America denies many immigrants the American dream. It is crucial to understand the historical context of immigration in America. Initially, most immigrants were from Europe and were not restricted by any immigration laws. Now, most immigrants come from Latin America but are restricted to severe immigration laws. The Latino/a community is one of the most severely affected groups because the current immigration system disproportionally affects Latino/as. Recognizing how the experience of Latino/a immigrants have been both similar and different in the past from other immigrant groups and dispelling common misconceptions about Latino/as today bring an awareness how Latino/as are affected. Latino/a immigrants share similar experiences of anti-immigrant rhetoric just like other immigrant groups. Many Latino/as in America have faced negative comments based on their identity. For example, Rush Limbaugh, a radio host, expounds negative comments toward Latino/as, particularly Mexicans. He claimed that Mexicans are â€Å"a renegade, potential[ly] criminal element† that is â€Å"unwilling to work† (Media Matters for America, 2/28/06). These malice comments were similar to that of other immigrants. As other immigrant groups of non-English descent started arriving in America, there was an immigrant phobia towards the newcomers. During the mid-1700s, Benjamin Franklin said ... ...ves of immigrant groups such as the Indians, Chinese, and Germans have proved that prior policies have been based on anti-immigrant rhetoric at that time. Therefore, reforming the immigration policies today should not be based on racism, or nativism. In addition, it is important to dispel the misconceptions of the Latino/a immigrations today because it is a mistake to formulate polices based on preconceptions of racialized groups. Works Cited Aoki, Andrew, and Okiyoshi Takeda. Asian American Politics. Polity Pr, 2009. Print. Fernandez, Lilia. "Introduction to U.S. Latino/Latina History." History 324. The Ohio State University. Jennings Hall 0040, Columbus, OH, USA. Address. Media Matters for America n. pag. Web. . "World War II by the Numbers." National World War II Museum n. pag. Web. .

Cyber Crime & internet

The full realization of the potential benefits brought by internet in the global community is greatly sabotaged by cyber crime activities. Cyber crime is increasingly becoming a major concern across the social, scientific, economic, and law enforcement fronts of the global community. Although the actual economic impact of cyber crimes is hard to qualify, it is estimated that the American nation looses over $100 million on internet related crimes every year. There are numerous types of cyber crimes (Laser, 2009).These includes; identity theft, fraud, hacking, cyber terrorism, malicious computer programs, web posting of offensive materials, and drug trafficking among others. Due to the negative social and economic impact of cyber crime activities, governments and other stakeholders have engaged in a number of prevention measures. They encompass creation of public awareness to enable internet users to identify, report, and/or avoid being victims of such crimes (McDowell, 2008). Software scientists have also engaged in developing effective computer and network security software.In addition to this, there are laws such as the Intellectual Property Law, Electronic Communication Privacy Law, and the 2001 Patriotic Act serve an important role in detecting and prosecuting cyber crime offenders. This essay seeks to discuss malicious computer programs (also know as malware) as a form of cyber crime, its characteristics and how it is prevented, detected, and/or prosecuted. Malicious computer programs are defined as coded programs, which serve either to corrupt the effective functioning of a computer system or lead to unwarranted remote accessing of information from a computer network (Loader, Douglas, & Thomas, 2000).Viruses and worms are the most common types of malicious computer programs or software. Other malicious computer programs include spyware, and Trojan. They are codes which serve to compromise information stored in computer network devices. This type of malicio us computer programs is commonly associated with infecting executable computer files and denial of network access by authorized users (Loader, Douglas, Thomas, 2000). Indeed, through extensive infecting of computer files, such codes are responsible for crashing of computer network devices.Other common forms of malicious computer programs are deceptive Trojan horses, multi-purpose bots, and spyware programs. This is increasingly becoming a common cyber crime. Such programs are characterized by their ability to allow for the stealing of sensitive information from protected networks (Metropolitan Police, 2009). According to available information on these malicious computer programs, they can serve to aid a hacker in remotely accessing passwords and credit card details of network users without detection.In addition, due to their sophisticated capability, such programs are employed for facilitating corrupting of confidential information stored institutional networks (Loader, Douglas, & T homas, 2000). Such can also be used by terrorist groups to qualify the crucial information from their target government prior to attacks. There are numerous ways established for preventing malicious computer programs as a cyber crime activity. The most common measure is the creation of awareness among the general public and institutions on how to identify and mitigate being affected malicious computer programs (McDowell, 2008).To realize this preventive measure, network software scientists have engaged in numerous researches; developing highly intelligent network security software. Indeed, some software such as antivirus are commonly found free in the internet. Such are serving the crucial purpose of mitigating infection of computer networks by malicious computer codes such as virus and worm among others. Still, this intelligent network security software brings with them the ability to identify and deny access of systems by unauthorized users (Lasar, 2009).According to available res earch findings on the effectives of malicious computer programs, it is clearly established that some forms of these programs which are hard to control. In a move to protect the integrity of information technology in the society, it is a common practice for highly sensitive institutions to close down their networks upon realizing any errant behaviors. It is worth noting that such moves are instrumental in ensuring the continued illegal access of networks by hackers. This is usually followed by a change of the overall access security codes and other check requirements.Indeed, for security codes of highly sensitive institutional networks, constant changing is recommended to reduce access chances by hackers. The process of detecting and prosecuting cyber crimes is quite complex. This has been closely attributed to the fact that offenders in these crimes employ high sophisticated technologies (Metropolitan Police, 2009). It is commonly claimed that thieves are usually ahead of technology . Another problem compromising the process of detecting and prosecuting malicious computer programs crime offenders is low rates of reporting such crimes by the victims (McDowell, 2008).Such have also been associated by the failure of network company providers to cooperate with the law enforcement in identifying such incidences. Despite these drawbacks, the war on malicious computer programs as a cyber crime activity has employed a number of methods. First is the use of computer forensic investigation practices to qualify evidence of suspect malicious computer program offender (Lasar, 2009). This process involves technological analysis of collected data by forensic computer scientists.It is to be underscored that according to existing laws such as the Intellectual Property Law and Electronic Communication Privacy Law provides for legal suits against the programmers and distributors of malicious computer programs (Loader, Douglas, Thomas, 2000). Another commonly used measure in detec ting cyber crimes is the tapping of communication networks by law enforcement agents. Although this method has received heavy critics for interfering with the privacy and confidentiality of communication, it serves great purpose in mitigating unwarranted access of sensitive networks.The Patriotic Act of 2001, which allows for government surveillance of the internet, is aimed at mitigating terrorist activities. According to the provisions of the Act, law enforcement is given legal authority to intercept internet communications by crime suspects. Another crucial provision of the Act is its mandatory dictate for network providers to cooperate with the law enforcement in identifying the original of a given communication of malicious programs. Based on this reason, the process of detecting malicious computer programs has significantly improved with the enforcement of the Patriotic Act.Another measure of detecting cyber crime activities is the modern streamlining of the reporting and resp onsiveness practices in the law enforcement (McDowell, 2008). This encourages institutions and individual victims of malicious computer programs to report such incidences, thus enhancing the process of mitigating such criminal activities by the law enforcement agencies. In conclusion, the escalating problem of cyber crime activities is increasingly compromising the realization of the potential benefits brought internet technological advancements in the community.Although all cyber crimes have negative social and economic impacts in the society, malicious computer programs are a real threat to the security of nations across the global. Such programs are evidently blamed for corrupting executable computer network file, crashing of network devices, denying access by authorized users, and allowing access of private information by hackers. Therefore, there is need for more consulted efforts by the computer security software scientists, law enforcement, and other stakeholders to engage in formulating effective measures of fighting cyber crime. References Lasar, M. (2009).An introduction to the FBI’s anti-cyber crime network. Retrieved May 28, 2010, from http://arstechnica. com/web/news/2009/11/an-introduction-to-the-fbis-anti-cybercrime-network. ars Loader, B. , Douglas, T. , & Thomas, D. (2000). Cyber crime: Law Enforcement, Security, and Surveillance in the Information. New York: Routledge. McDowell, M. (2008). National Cyber Alert System. Retrieved May 28, 2010, from http://www. us-cert. gov/cas/tips/ST05-006. html Metropolitan Police. (2009). Trojan’ computer arrests. Retrieved May 28, 2010, from http://cms. met. police. uk/news/arrests_and_charges/trojan_computer_virus_arrests